Some books take 2-3 years to complete. Some take a lifetime. Some remain unfinished. This is how I felt after reading Iain McGilchrist's The Master and his Emissary. Despite 20 years of research, McGilchrist seems to have spent too much time on his remote island detached from communication media. Nowhere in this beautifully written book is Marshall McLuhan mentioned, or the effects of media technologies on perception. While philosophers still debate the levels of influence screen media plays upon human consciousness, few would doubt we live in a highly pervasive pop culture. McGilchrist’s analysis of how brain lateralization shapes culture suffers from what McLuhan coined the rear-view mirror, i.e. we evaluate present environmental media via nostalgic metaphors of the past. Their effects therefore remain invisible to us.
Since the 1960s explosion of TV, media ecologists have been examining the considerable shifts in cognitive perception, with many reporting a gradual feminization of the male psyche (70s sexual liberation, 80s androgyny, 90s metrosexuality). So where exactly has McGilchrist been residing? If the latest studies on the numbing effects of digital media on critical thinking are correct (Carr, 2010) McGilchrist's argument should be championing a left-brain renaissance. Without fully examining such effects, McGilchrist fails to offer any genuine alternative to either Jaynes or McLuhan, barely moving beyond the linear technophobic conclusions of Heidegger. The world is implosively electric McGilchrist, I suggest you plug in before it’s too late.
Carr, N., The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (W. W. Norton, 2010)